Trembling Hand Equilibria of Plurality Voting
نویسندگان
چکیده
Trembling hand (TH) equilibria were introduced by Selten in 1975. Intuitively, these are Nash equilibria that remain stable when players assume that there is a small probability that other players will choose off-equilibrium strategies. This concept is useful for equilibrium refinement, i.e., selecting the most plausible Nash equilibria when the set of all Nash equilibria can be very large, as is the case, for instance, for Plurality voting with strategic voters. In this paper, we analyze TH equilibria of Plurality voting. We provide an efficient algorithm for computing a TH best response and establish many useful properties of TH equilibria in Plurality voting games. On the negative side, we provide an example of a Plurality voting game with no TH equilibria, and show that it is NP-hard to check whether a given Plurality voting game admits a TH equilibrium where a specific candidate is among the election winners.
منابع مشابه
1205 on Computational Social Choice : STSM Report
Applicant: Svetlana Obraztsova Home institution: Hebrew University of Jerusalem Home country: Israel Host:Edith Elkind Host institution: University of Oxford Host country: United Kingdom Dates: 09-03-2016 to 20-03-2016 During my visit to University of Oxford I closely worked with my host, Prof. Elkind. Our main discussion was about Trembling Hand equilibria for Voting games, precisely, to Votin...
متن کاملRobust Political Equilibria under Plurality and Runoff Rule∗
A central problem for the game theoretic analysis of voting is that voting games have very many Nash equilibria. In this paper, we consider a new refinement concept for voting games that combines two ideas that appear reasonable for voting games: First, trembling hand perfection (voters sometimes make mistakes when casting their vote) and second, coordination of voters with similar interests. W...
متن کاملEquilibrium Refinement in Dynamic Voting Games
We propose two related equilibrium re nements for voting and agenda-setting games, Sequentially Weakly Undominated Equilibrium (SWUE) and Markov Trembling Hand Perfect Equilibrium (MTHPE), and show how these equilibrium concepts eliminate non-intuitive equilibria that arise naturally in dynamic voting games and games in which random or deterministic sequences of agenda-setters make o¤ers to sev...
متن کاملEquilibrium Renement in Dynamic Voting Games
We propose two related equilibrium re nements for voting and agenda-setting games, Sequentially Weakly Undominated Equilibrium (SWUE) and Markov Trembling Hand Perfect Equilibrium (MTHPE), and show how these equilibrium concepts eliminate non-intuitive equilibria that arise naturally in dynamic voting games and games in which random or deterministic sequences of agenda-setters make o¤ers to sev...
متن کاملAnalysis of Equilibria in Iterative Voting Schemes
Following recent studies of iterative voting and its effects on plurality vote outcomes, we provide characterisations and complexity results for three models of iterative voting under the plurality rule. Our focus is on providing a better understanding regarding the set of equilibria attainable by iterative voting processes. We start with the basic model of plurality voting. We first establish ...
متن کامل